Introduction In the first part of this article, I discussed the Covid-19 narrative in the context of nature. The article concluded that there were significant signs of an agenda to detach human beings from nature: firstly, in the denial of the reality of death, and secondly, through the normalisation of mRNA and adenovirus vector vaccinations. […]
The Covid 19 Narrative is About Destroying Our Links With the Natural World (Part 2) — Cassandra’s Box
By Paul Joseph Watson
A must-watch video:
CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE
Dear Member of the European Parliament,
Re: Green Pass Requires Debate, Not Emergency Adoption, COM 2021 130
We write to oppose the Parliament’s adoption of the “Green Pass” (Digital Green Certificate, introduced March 17, 2021 with proposal #COM 2021 130) without thorough, vigorous debate. While the intent of the Green Pass is to facilitate travel during the COVID-19 pandemic, we fear it will do the exact opposite: it will stifle travel and human interaction.
We are extremely concerned about how the proposed regulation will affect all travel in the Schengen Zone, for European citizens and others alike, requiring individuals to prove receipt of an experimental vaccine or submission to experimental testing.
The proposal’s premise is that it will prevent transmission of SARS-Cov-2, but it is on shaky scientific and legal ground and requires in-depth debate for the reasons listed below.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has repeatedly stated that there is no data proving that COVID-19 vaccines block transmission of the coronavirus. For this reason, vaccinated individuals must continue to maintain social distancing and mask wearing.
While the EMA hopes vaccines will reduce COVID, the reverse may occur: mass vaccination may increase disease spread. This was the case with the Dengvaxia vaccine in the Philippines, as the World Health Organization (WHO) Vaccine Safety Summit detailed in 2019. Independent scientists assessing results in Israel and the United Kingdom question the success of mass vaccination. As coronaviruses are constantly mutating, the effectiveness of these novel vaccines against new variants is doubtful.
While PCR tests may be able to diagnose a sick person in a short time window, they have almost no relevance for those who show no symptoms of illness. Positive PCR tests do not confirm illness or contagiousness and many result in ‘false positive cases’.
A recent review in the medical journal The Lancet estimated that isolation of false positive cases is “a net loss to the health, social and economic wellbeing of communities” and concluded that “PCR testing is therefore not the appropriate gold standard for evaluating a SARS-CoV-2 public health test.”
In January 2021, the WHO released new guidance on PCR tests, also warning of the danger of false positive results: “as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases.”
Member states should stop testing healthy people and use those resources for treatment.
The proposed regulations infringe fundamental human rights, including rights to travel, assembly, privacy, conscience and free and informed consent. Recent scientific studies cast serious doubt on the effectiveness of draconian measures to limit disease spread, including travel restrictions and lockdown measures.
Implementing the Green Pass will require massive resources without a well-founded expectation of success. Investment in hospitals and protections for those at risk would be more effective and economical. At the very least, a cost–benefit analysis and debate are absolutely necessary.
COVID-19 vaccines have received only conditional approval; clinical trials will not be complete for months or years. Demanding that European Union citizens and visitors be subject to experimental medical products to exercise fundamental rights violates the precautionary principle enshrined in Article 191 of the Treaty of Functioning of the European Union.
How these vaccines will affect people in coming months or years is unknown. The risk of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) is real, i.e. that vaccinated individuals exposed to new viral strains may be at increased risk compared to those who have not been vaccinated. This potentially lethal risk is well-known to vaccine experts and is one of the main reasons why vaccine manufacturers refuse to accept liability for future injuries and deaths.
Several COVID-19 vaccines are based on a novel gene technology never used in healthy individuals before. Manufacturers sidelined the risks in modifying the human genome and triggering autoimmune diseases in the headlong rush to release the vaccines. On July 15, 2020, the European Parliament voted to waive the risk assessment for these vaccines under the Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Regulation. Prominent scientists and doctors recently addressed these concerns in an open letter to the EMA. Further study on the impact of these gene therapies is required before making them compulsory.
Esteemed Belgium lawyers recently concluded that the European Commission granted invalid liability and warranty exemptions to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers. Given the lack of evidence of safety or effectiveness, manufacturers unsurprisingly refuse to guarantee either. Member States, and ultimately the electorate, will bear the burden of compensating and caring for victims of vaccine injury.
Although the proposed regulation states that Member States will protect medical data, there is little to guarantee this protection. These medical data may be used to discriminate against individuals in violation of fundamental rights and freedoms.
Mass vaccination with imperfect vaccines – and none of the available vaccines is perfect – may lead totype replacement and viral mutation. It may well be vaccinated individuals, not unvaccinated ones, that pose the greatest risk of new, more virulent types of coronavirus infection. The classic example of this kind of type replacement occurred with widespread use of the pertussis vaccine, which led to new viral mutations that the existing vaccine did not block. In other words, it is unclear that mass vaccination will lead to an end to the coronavirus crisis.
While the Parliament considers the Green Pass regulation as a temporary measure, it is unlikely to be so. Such restrictions usually become permanent, making the need for robust debate the more important. Could more vaccines be required under the Green Pass at a later date? Why should the Director-General of the World Health Organization have the power to make decisions about them? The long-term implications of the Green Pass require deliberation.
Too often since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, numbers have ruled instead of the rule of law. Small coteries of experts interpreting numbers have set policy instead of democratic legislatures and civil society. Numbers and studies are too often tailored to serve those who produce them. Europe cannot thrive if it relies on mathematical models to the exclusion of human models. The Parliament is entrusted to uphold democratic values.
***
Please take these points above into consideration and require open debate and analysis before you take further action on the Green Pass.
Yours sincerely,
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Chair, Children’s Health Defense
Senta Depuydt
President, Children’s Health Defense Europe
************
By Dr. Mark Sircus
Now we have Dr. Anthony Fauci ready to do vaccine experiments on children while ignoring the harm the vaccines are already doing to elderly populations. “Hopefully, by the time we get to the late spring, early summer, we will have children being able to be vaccinated according to the FDA’s guidance,” said Dr. Fauci. The world is suffering from a mass delusional psychosis and Fauci, in significant part, is to blame. When will he be captured? Will he ever stop lying or trying to deceive masses of people?
We have psychopaths and sociopaths dressed up as politicians, public health officials, and billionaires, with egos the size of Jupiter, running the human race as hard as possible into the ground (mass graves). […]
Why have we allowed deranged lunatics to take over the world? It is anyone’s guess, but we have, and humanity is suffering greatly for it.
Dr. Fauci is extremely dangerous, and he’s hurting/killing many people and, in the process doing his best to destroy a country of over 300 million souls. The worst part is that politicians, other health officials, and doctors, and nurses who should know better are putting up with him allowing him to do this harm. The level of medical ignorance he is teaching goes over the top of the Richter Scale, but he did have his moments of sanity when he recommended against wearing masks. Now he wants you to wear two.
When many people believe in obviously false and potentially distressing things based purely on hearsay, these beliefs are not considered clinical delusions by the psychiatric profession but are labeled instead as mass hysteria. Today, the public has been grossly misled about a range of issues from climate change to suffocating masks and the need for lockdowns and social distancing.
Other prominent delusions center around the safety of vaccines and the soundness of our financial system. The most basic misconception, though, is the belief that the good guys are good. And after that that we can trust what the media is saying to us.
A huge misconception is about Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies. […] The US pharma company is reportedly asking for military bases and sovereign assets from poorer countries to guarantee vaccines. I live in Brazil, one of the countries that refused to surrender to the fascist demands from Pfizer, and it was in the local news. […]
In England, people with learning disabilities have been given do not resuscitate orders during the second wave of the pandemic, despite the widespread condemnation of the practice last year and an urgent investigation by the care watchdog. Mencap said it had received reports in January from people with learning disabilities that they had been told they would not be resuscitated if they were taken ill with Covid-19.
The COVID pandemic has brought out the worst in man in many of our leadership and prominent corporations, which takes us right back into the lap of fascism. The governor of New York is a prime example, and it seems the law is going to catch up with him. He will be lucky if he does not eventually get charged with the manslaughter of nursing home residents for all the excess deaths that occurred. […] But what has the new medical fascism done with the old and the young? The Automatic Earth says:
“For the elderly it means having to spend their last years and days in near-absolute solitude. If you would ask them, many would say: just give me the virus, as long as I can see my children and grandchildren and friends while I’m still alive. But nobody asks them. They spent their entire lives just to be silenced. In order to eradicate a virus, we eradicate the very people who built the world we inherited from them.”
“For the very young it means stunted development. There is a ton of literature about how the first 5 or 10 years shape a child for life. Well, we just took a full year and counting away from that shape. We have no way of knowing to what extent that will affect them, but it won’t be zero. People are adaptive, sure, but that can be a negative thing just as much as a positive one. Caged animals adapt too; with neurosis. Children need to interact with each other, and with adults, to find their place in the world. How are they going to find that place now?
In Canada Peel Health has issued guidelines to parents instructing them to keep any children who have been sent home because a classmate has tested positive for COVID-19 isolated in a separate room from all other family members for 14 days. “This is cruel punishment for a child, especially for younger children, 4-10 years old, ” Dr. Susan Richardson, a microbiologist and infectious disease physician who is also a professor emerita at University of Toronto, wrote. “Shutting a child off from their parents and siblings for up to 14 days in this manner could produce significant and long-lasting emotional and psychological effects.”
The ruling class is not friendly; it does not serve the best interests of the people. The modern tools of fascism are lockdowns, masks (suffocating muzzles), and vaccines. These are backed by censorship and propaganda campaigns in the mainstream press and by the digital giants, by Google, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. What does my favorite Nazi-type person have to say about vaccines? Pandemic will not end until the world is vaccinated, Merkel says. In the Age of COVID fascism, the truth is what they say it is.
A New York Times article quotes doctors who say the mRNA technology used in COVID vaccines may cause immune thrombocytopenia, a deadly blood disorder. The White House, which is not even trying to hide its fascist activities, is pleading with the most prominent digital social media companies to censor anything and everything that would reduce COVID vaccine sales.
We read from Spain: second Pfizer shots halted after 46 nursing home residents die after the first shot. Dentists are reporting that masks are causing extensive damage to their patient’s mouths,causing gum disease, and we read on Fox News that COVID-19 patients with gum disease are nine times more likely to die, one study says! Those with gum disease were 3.5 times more likely to be admitted to intensive care and 4.5 times more likely to need a ventilator.
What Does the Church Say About What is Happening?
In early November, an Italian archbishop and foe of Pope Francis, Carlo Maria Vigano, launched an attack against those behind pandemic lockdowns across the globe, warning President Trump in a letter of the coming “Great Reset” whose architects are “a global élite that wants to subdue all of humanity, imposing coercive measures with which to drastically limit individual freedoms and those of entire populations.”
“The purpose of the Great Reset is the imposition of a health dictatorship aiming at the imposition of liberticidal measures, hidden behind tempting promises of ensuring a universal income and canceling individual debt,” Vigano’s letter continues.
Six weeks later, one of the most influential Catholics in the United States, Cardinal Raymond Burke, has kicked it up a notch – slamming “secular forces” who want to “make us slaves to their godless and murderous agenda” in a Saturday homily. It sounds like both men are talking about the rise of the Fourth Reich.
Bottom Line. They are after our souls, not just our bodies.
Medical fascism is creeping up everywhere. A radical bill proposed by the French Government that would see unvaccinated people refused basic services such as public transport has been put on ice after a massive backlash. The proposed law mandates that citizens have proof of a negative COVID test or “preventative treatment, including the administration of a vaccine” in order to “access transport or to some locations, as well as certain activities.” However, the Government has been forced to delay the legislation after angry protests.
Conclusion
Robert Gore writes, “Totalitarianism has never produced anything but destruction, destitution, and death and never will, regardless of the totalitarians’ lofty rhetoric. Totalitarians are vultures, not eagles, and the current kettle of vultures intend to dine on the corpse of history’s most advanced civilization.” Who is spearheading this most recent advance are health officials and public health organizations like the WHO. And most politicians world over are in on it.
FULL ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE: https://drsircus.com/general/fascist-doctors-return-with-cruel-treatment/
Professor of Natural Oncology, Da Vinci Institute of Holistic Medicine
Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine
Founder of Natural Allopathic Medicine
Gates Lab Meat is more like food for transhumanism….next the half human half clone creature will only need to recharge their bodies with their solar eye shields. Think of the money that will be saved from that green plan. Green as in Soylent Green?
How it works
They tell you it’s microbes. What they don’t tell you is that it also takes Cell Lines that come from- form stem cells.
They want you to think in terms of microbes. Not in the terms of embryonic stem cells which – due to ethical and moral issues – are controversial when used in research. However, they do it anyway in the name of science. They have developed induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) – essentially multipotent blood and skin cells which have been reprogrammed back to a pluripotent state therefore enabling them to differentiate into a far greater range of specialized cells.
View original post 2,021 more words
Dr. Mike Yeadon, expert immunologist, shares some valuable truth-bombs:
People are so obsessed with immunization that in the process, they have become immune to facts, evidence and common sense. Fear is a terrible counselor.
Dr. Igor Shepherd’s Talk About the Horrors of a ‘Covid’ Vaccine Health Impact News – November 30, 2020 by Gary D. Barnett | Copyright © 2020 GaryDBarnett.com Dr. Igor Shepherd is a medical doctor/manager for Wyoming’s State Public Health Department/Preparedness Unit, and is on the Covid response team. I was able to have a conversation with […]
COVID Vaccines “Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction” says Wyoming Medical Doctor and Manager for Wyoming’s State Public Health Department | Health Impact News — Freedom For Humanity | We The People | Where We Go One, We Go All !
