Light-Warrior Michael DellaRocca delivers a message of empowerment and enlightenment:
Amazon fires delivery drivers who refuse ‘biometric consent’ form
Cameras powered by artificial intelligence will record and store information about the driver’s face, location, movement, driving style, and even if the driver yawns or shows signs of drowsiness on-shift.
By David McLoone For LIFE SITE News
Amazon delivery drivers across the country face the prospect of losing their jobs if they refuse to consent to intrusive new biometrics technology inside their vans and trucks. The technology would capture and store personal information on a “driver account.”
75,000 drivers in the U.S. were asked by the tech giant to sign new contracts at the end of March that permit Amazon to use camera technology, powered by artificial intelligence (AI), to identify and store information about the driver: his face, location, movement, driving style, and even if the driver yawns or shows signs of drowsiness on-shift. Information collected is then shared with the dispatcher.
Failure to comply with the request for consent will result in the termination of that driver’s employment with Amazon — or the related third-party delivery service partner (DSP) which employs them — a copy of the “Vehicle Technology and Biometric Consent Agreement” obtained by Motherhood confirmed.
Amazon disclosed in the form that vehicles will be “video-monitored by cameras that are both internal and external and that operate while the ignition is on and for up to 20 minutes after the ignition is turned off.”
“Using your photograph, this Technology, may create Biometric Information, and collect, store, and use Biometric Information from such photographs.”
“This Technology tracks vehicle location and movement, including miles driven, speed, acceleration, braking, turns, and following distance … as a condition of delivery [sic] packages for Amazon, you consent to the use of Technology,” the form states.
The technology is being provided by Netradyne, a fleet management AI-technology start-up from San Diego. In a February announcement, reported by The Information, Amazon said the company’s four-lens “Driveri” camera would be installed in its delivery vehicles for “safety” reasons, as well as improving the “quality of the delivery experience.”
A presentation from Netradyne demonstrates the capabilities of the technology, including identifying a driver’s “seatbelt compliance” and “distraction” level, which ranges from using a cell-phone to simply “looking down.” Driving style is also closely monitored, with events like “hard acceleration” and stop sign violations being recorded and swiftly reported to dispatchers.
Deborah Bass, a spokeswoman for Amazon, stated that the decision to implement round-the-clock surveillance on their drivers was made “to help keep drivers and the communities where we deliver safe.”
Bass explained that Amazon previously “piloted the technology from April to October 2020 on over two million miles of delivery routes and the results produced remarkable driver and community safety improvements — accidents decreased 48 percent, stop sign violations decreased 20 percent, driving without a seatbelt decreased 60 percent, and distracted driving decreased 45 percent.”
“Don’t believe the self-interested critics who claim these cameras are intended for anything other than safety,” she added.
Eva Blum-Dumontet, Senior Research Officer at Privacy International, a U.K.-based charity dedicated to protecting privacy rights across the globe, mockedBass’ contention that Amazon is “worried about road safety,” calling the notion “disingenuous.”
“The only thing they are concerned about here is their reputation and ensuring they can draw maximum profit from their drivers,” she said, adding that if Amazon “were truly concerned about road safety, the solution would be actually hiring employees and offering them enough protection so that they are not enticed to complete more tasks than it is safe to do so.”
In like manner, a number of employees (remaining nameless for fear of retaliation from Amazon) soon expressed concern that the company will use the countless hours of footage as “a punishment system,” likening the system to “Big Brother.”
Giving substance to driver concerns, the “biometric consent” form detailed that “Amazon may … use certain Technology that processes Biometric Information, including on-board safety camera technology which collects your photograph for the purposes of confirming your identity and connecting you to your driver account.”
One driver, Vic, quit his job delivering packages for Amazon in the Denver, Colorado, area after learning of the requirement to have AI-powered cameras constantly watch him while working, he told Reuters. “It was both a privacy violation, and a breach of trust … And I was not going to stand for it,” he said.
The installation of high-tech cameras is just the latest in a line of increasingly invasive biometric requirements imposed by Amazon, Vic said, explaining that drivers were already asked to install a monitoring app, Mentor, which logged a number of driving details.
“If we went over a bump, the phone would rattle, the Mentor app would log that I used the phone while driving, and boom, I’d get docked,” he said.
Biometrics technology, including facial recognition software, is becoming increasingly sophisticated, giving rise to new ethical concerns. In January, researchers at Stanford University, California, published a paper in which they claim it is possible to teach a computer to recognize a person’s political leanings, purely from scanning their face.
Using a collection of over one million images, freely taken from dating websites and from public Facebook profiles, the team claims the machine correctly predicted political orientation 72% of the time, which is “remarkably better than chance (50%), human accuracy (55%), or one afforded by a 100-item personality questionnaire (66%).”
Lead analyst on the team, Michal Kosinski, warned that it is supremely easy to obtain images through “ubiquitous CCTV cameras and giant databases of facial images.”
On account of this, the technology could be used for nefarious purposes, he noted, since “unlike many other biometric systems, facial recognition can be used without subjects’ consent or knowledge.”
The researchers added that “even a crude estimate of an audience’s psychological traits [based on facial recognition] can drastically boost the efficiency of mass persuasion. We hope that scholars, policymakers, engineers, and citizens will take notice.”
“Political correctness is fascism pretending to be manners.”GEORGE CARLIN
Introduction In the first part of this article, I discussed the Covid-19 narrative in the context of nature. The article concluded that there were significant signs of an agenda to detach human beings from nature: firstly, in the denial of the reality of death, and secondly, through the normalisation of mRNA and adenovirus vector vaccinations. […]The Covid 19 Narrative is About Destroying Our Links With the Natural World (Part 2) — Cassandra’s Box
By Paul Joseph Watson
A must-watch video:
I found this post to be particularly relevant for this Holy Week in these peculiar times. Celia Hale’s messages always bring me a sense of peace.
“I am forced to the conclusion that many people go through the lip-service act of saying their prayers without the slightest belief that those prayers will be answered. Consequently, they are not answered.” The Magic of Believing, by Claude Bristol
Why is this quotation true? It is because “belief” is such a necessary component of the law of attraction. We discover a need in ourselves, we ask that the need be answered, but then we doubt. And doubt is a killer of dreams.
Know that God is real. I believe that He is a personal God Who answers prayers. I do not believe that His answer is audible to us, but I do believe it occurs in the silence when we get quiet. Often we will realize that we know how to solve the dilemma before us now. Often we have this sense of knowing what to do next to…
View original post 149 more words
CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE
Dear Member of the European Parliament,
Re: Green Pass Requires Debate, Not Emergency Adoption, COM 2021 130
We write to oppose the Parliament’s adoption of the “Green Pass” (Digital Green Certificate, introduced March 17, 2021 with proposal #COM 2021 130) without thorough, vigorous debate. While the intent of the Green Pass is to facilitate travel during the COVID-19 pandemic, we fear it will do the exact opposite: it will stifle travel and human interaction.
We are extremely concerned about how the proposed regulation will affect all travel in the Schengen Zone, for European citizens and others alike, requiring individuals to prove receipt of an experimental vaccine or submission to experimental testing.
The proposal’s premise is that it will prevent transmission of SARS-Cov-2, but it is on shaky scientific and legal ground and requires in-depth debate for the reasons listed below.
1. There is No Proof that Vaccination Blocks Transmission of SARS-CoV-2
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has repeatedly stated that there is no data proving that COVID-19 vaccines block transmission of the coronavirus. For this reason, vaccinated individuals must continue to maintain social distancing and mask wearing.
While the EMA hopes vaccines will reduce COVID, the reverse may occur: mass vaccination may increase disease spread. This was the case with the Dengvaxia vaccine in the Philippines, as the World Health Organization (WHO) Vaccine Safety Summit detailed in 2019. Independent scientists assessing results in Israel and the United Kingdom question the success of mass vaccination. As coronaviruses are constantly mutating, the effectiveness of these novel vaccines against new variants is doubtful.
2. PCR Tests Are Unreliable Public Health Measures
While PCR tests may be able to diagnose a sick person in a short time window, they have almost no relevance for those who show no symptoms of illness. Positive PCR tests do not confirm illness or contagiousness and many result in ‘false positive cases’.
A recent review in the medical journal The Lancet estimated that isolation of false positive cases is “a net loss to the health, social and economic wellbeing of communities” and concluded that “PCR testing is therefore not the appropriate gold standard for evaluating a SARS-CoV-2 public health test.”
In January 2021, the WHO released new guidance on PCR tests, also warning of the danger of false positive results: “as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases.”
Member states should stop testing healthy people and use those resources for treatment.
3. The Green Pass is legally disproportionate
The proposed regulations infringe fundamental human rights, including rights to travel, assembly, privacy, conscience and free and informed consent. Recent scientific studies cast serious doubt on the effectiveness of draconian measures to limit disease spread, including travel restrictions and lockdown measures.
Implementing the Green Pass will require massive resources without a well-founded expectation of success. Investment in hospitals and protections for those at risk would be more effective and economical. At the very least, a cost–benefit analysis and debate are absolutely necessary.
4. The European Parliament Must Apply the Precautionary Principle
COVID-19 vaccines have received only conditional approval; clinical trials will not be complete for months or years. Demanding that European Union citizens and visitors be subject to experimental medical products to exercise fundamental rights violates the precautionary principle enshrined in Article 191 of the Treaty of Functioning of the European Union.
How these vaccines will affect people in coming months or years is unknown. The risk of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) is real, i.e. that vaccinated individuals exposed to new viral strains may be at increased risk compared to those who have not been vaccinated. This potentially lethal risk is well-known to vaccine experts and is one of the main reasons why vaccine manufacturers refuse to accept liability for future injuries and deaths.
Several COVID-19 vaccines are based on a novel gene technology never used in healthy individuals before. Manufacturers sidelined the risks in modifying the human genome and triggering autoimmune diseases in the headlong rush to release the vaccines. On July 15, 2020, the European Parliament voted to waive the risk assessment for these vaccines under the Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Regulation. Prominent scientists and doctors recently addressed these concerns in an open letter to the EMA. Further study on the impact of these gene therapies is required before making them compulsory.
5. Vaccine Manufacturers Fail to Warrant Effectiveness or Safety
Esteemed Belgium lawyers recently concluded that the European Commission granted invalid liability and warranty exemptions to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers. Given the lack of evidence of safety or effectiveness, manufacturers unsurprisingly refuse to guarantee either. Member States, and ultimately the electorate, will bear the burden of compensating and caring for victims of vaccine injury.
6. Inadequate Guarantee of Data Privacy
Although the proposed regulation states that Member States will protect medical data, there is little to guarantee this protection. These medical data may be used to discriminate against individuals in violation of fundamental rights and freedoms.
7. Risk of Type Replacement and Viral Mutation
Mass vaccination with imperfect vaccines – and none of the available vaccines is perfect – may lead totype replacement and viral mutation. It may well be vaccinated individuals, not unvaccinated ones, that pose the greatest risk of new, more virulent types of coronavirus infection. The classic example of this kind of type replacement occurred with widespread use of the pertussis vaccine, which led to new viral mutations that the existing vaccine did not block. In other words, it is unclear that mass vaccination will lead to an end to the coronavirus crisis.
8. Risk that Green Passes Become Permanent Without Due Consideration
While the Parliament considers the Green Pass regulation as a temporary measure, it is unlikely to be so. Such restrictions usually become permanent, making the need for robust debate the more important. Could more vaccines be required under the Green Pass at a later date? Why should the Director-General of the World Health Organization have the power to make decisions about them? The long-term implications of the Green Pass require deliberation.
9. The European Parliament Must Uphold Democratic Values
Too often since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, numbers have ruled instead of the rule of law. Small coteries of experts interpreting numbers have set policy instead of democratic legislatures and civil society. Numbers and studies are too often tailored to serve those who produce them. Europe cannot thrive if it relies on mathematical models to the exclusion of human models. The Parliament is entrusted to uphold democratic values.
Please take these points above into consideration and require open debate and analysis before you take further action on the Green Pass.
The citizens of Europe and the world are watching you — our liberty and security are in your hands. Do not let us down! Do not put the future of the European Union in jeopardy by desecrating one of its most fundamental principles: free movement within the Schengen Area.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Chair, Children’s Health Defense
President, Children’s Health Defense Europe
Lisa Renee is a human encyclopedia for knowledge on energy:
“We are in a world where links to higher genetic expression have been turned off at the will of others serving the NAA programs that are intentionally poisoning the human body and the earth body. When we have this knowledge about the natural function of the human body, then we can reverse engineer this process and look at it from all sides. What factors can we see in our environment today that could be used to prevent higher gene expression or to turn off the link towards higher genetic expression in the human body? Some of those factors may appear to be the control taken over the natural access to the sunlight frequencies, such as through mass weather modification in the lower atmosphere. There is a powerful agenda of Social Engineering to gain control over thoughts and gain access to the human mind, in order to prevent free and open…
View original post 667 more words
A beautiful and timely post from Celia Hales
“Observe how the thought pattern of worry blocks access to peace, and therefore to your true self.” Choose Only Love bk.3, 3:I
I came from a long line of worriers. My grandmother said I came by my worry “honestly.” Only she, my grandmother, in four generations, remained peaceful and calm.
I do know that this quotation from Choose Only Love is right on. All is not lost, though, for I have made great strides to eliminate worry—just using thought stoppage, silently saying “Stop!,” when I start to fret.
We all want to come to know our true self. And this quotation tells us we can’t do that if we are caught up in the fruitless process of worrying. Peace is our birthright. Worry is a holdover from the ego.
Ask for peace today. Ask for peace every day. We can change the habits of a lifetime if we put our…
View original post 8 more words
By Dr. Mark Sircus
Now we have Dr. Anthony Fauci ready to do vaccine experiments on children while ignoring the harm the vaccines are already doing to elderly populations. “Hopefully, by the time we get to the late spring, early summer, we will have children being able to be vaccinated according to the FDA’s guidance,” said Dr. Fauci. The world is suffering from a mass delusional psychosis and Fauci, in significant part, is to blame. When will he be captured? Will he ever stop lying or trying to deceive masses of people?
We have psychopaths and sociopaths dressed up as politicians, public health officials, and billionaires, with egos the size of Jupiter, running the human race as hard as possible into the ground (mass graves). […]
Why have we allowed deranged lunatics to take over the world? It is anyone’s guess, but we have, and humanity is suffering greatly for it.
Dr. Fauci is extremely dangerous, and he’s hurting/killing many people and, in the process doing his best to destroy a country of over 300 million souls. The worst part is that politicians, other health officials, and doctors, and nurses who should know better are putting up with him allowing him to do this harm. The level of medical ignorance he is teaching goes over the top of the Richter Scale, but he did have his moments of sanity when he recommended against wearing masks. Now he wants you to wear two.
When many people believe in obviously false and potentially distressing things based purely on hearsay, these beliefs are not considered clinical delusions by the psychiatric profession but are labeled instead as mass hysteria. Today, the public has been grossly misled about a range of issues from climate change to suffocating masks and the need for lockdowns and social distancing.
Other prominent delusions center around the safety of vaccines and the soundness of our financial system. The most basic misconception, though, is the belief that the good guys are good. And after that that we can trust what the media is saying to us.
A huge misconception is about Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies. […] The US pharma company is reportedly asking for military bases and sovereign assets from poorer countries to guarantee vaccines. I live in Brazil, one of the countries that refused to surrender to the fascist demands from Pfizer, and it was in the local news. […]
In England, people with learning disabilities have been given do not resuscitate orders during the second wave of the pandemic, despite the widespread condemnation of the practice last year and an urgent investigation by the care watchdog. Mencap said it had received reports in January from people with learning disabilities that they had been told they would not be resuscitated if they were taken ill with Covid-19.
The COVID pandemic has brought out the worst in man in many of our leadership and prominent corporations, which takes us right back into the lap of fascism. The governor of New York is a prime example, and it seems the law is going to catch up with him. He will be lucky if he does not eventually get charged with the manslaughter of nursing home residents for all the excess deaths that occurred. […] But what has the new medical fascism done with the old and the young? The Automatic Earth says:
“For the elderly it means having to spend their last years and days in near-absolute solitude. If you would ask them, many would say: just give me the virus, as long as I can see my children and grandchildren and friends while I’m still alive. But nobody asks them. They spent their entire lives just to be silenced. In order to eradicate a virus, we eradicate the very people who built the world we inherited from them.”
“For the very young it means stunted development. There is a ton of literature about how the first 5 or 10 years shape a child for life. Well, we just took a full year and counting away from that shape. We have no way of knowing to what extent that will affect them, but it won’t be zero. People are adaptive, sure, but that can be a negative thing just as much as a positive one. Caged animals adapt too; with neurosis. Children need to interact with each other, and with adults, to find their place in the world. How are they going to find that place now?
In Canada Peel Health has issued guidelines to parents instructing them to keep any children who have been sent home because a classmate has tested positive for COVID-19 isolated in a separate room from all other family members for 14 days. “This is cruel punishment for a child, especially for younger children, 4-10 years old, ” Dr. Susan Richardson, a microbiologist and infectious disease physician who is also a professor emerita at University of Toronto, wrote. “Shutting a child off from their parents and siblings for up to 14 days in this manner could produce significant and long-lasting emotional and psychological effects.”
The ruling class is not friendly; it does not serve the best interests of the people. The modern tools of fascism are lockdowns, masks (suffocating muzzles), and vaccines. These are backed by censorship and propaganda campaigns in the mainstream press and by the digital giants, by Google, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. What does my favorite Nazi-type person have to say about vaccines? Pandemic will not end until the world is vaccinated, Merkel says. In the Age of COVID fascism, the truth is what they say it is.
A New York Times article quotes doctors who say the mRNA technology used in COVID vaccines may cause immune thrombocytopenia, a deadly blood disorder. The White House, which is not even trying to hide its fascist activities, is pleading with the most prominent digital social media companies to censor anything and everything that would reduce COVID vaccine sales.
We read from Spain: second Pfizer shots halted after 46 nursing home residents die after the first shot. Dentists are reporting that masks are causing extensive damage to their patient’s mouths,causing gum disease, and we read on Fox News that COVID-19 patients with gum disease are nine times more likely to die, one study says! Those with gum disease were 3.5 times more likely to be admitted to intensive care and 4.5 times more likely to need a ventilator.
What Does the Church Say About What is Happening?
In early November, an Italian archbishop and foe of Pope Francis, Carlo Maria Vigano, launched an attack against those behind pandemic lockdowns across the globe, warning President Trump in a letter of the coming “Great Reset” whose architects are “a global élite that wants to subdue all of humanity, imposing coercive measures with which to drastically limit individual freedoms and those of entire populations.”
“The purpose of the Great Reset is the imposition of a health dictatorship aiming at the imposition of liberticidal measures, hidden behind tempting promises of ensuring a universal income and canceling individual debt,” Vigano’s letter continues.
Six weeks later, one of the most influential Catholics in the United States, Cardinal Raymond Burke, has kicked it up a notch – slamming “secular forces” who want to “make us slaves to their godless and murderous agenda” in a Saturday homily. It sounds like both men are talking about the rise of the Fourth Reich.
Bottom Line. They are after our souls, not just our bodies.
Medical fascism is creeping up everywhere. A radical bill proposed by the French Government that would see unvaccinated people refused basic services such as public transport has been put on ice after a massive backlash. The proposed law mandates that citizens have proof of a negative COVID test or “preventative treatment, including the administration of a vaccine” in order to “access transport or to some locations, as well as certain activities.” However, the Government has been forced to delay the legislation after angry protests.
Robert Gore writes, “Totalitarianism has never produced anything but destruction, destitution, and death and never will, regardless of the totalitarians’ lofty rhetoric. Totalitarians are vultures, not eagles, and the current kettle of vultures intend to dine on the corpse of history’s most advanced civilization.” Who is spearheading this most recent advance are health officials and public health organizations like the WHO. And most politicians world over are in on it.
FULL ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE: https://drsircus.com/general/fascist-doctors-return-with-cruel-treatment/
Dr. Mark SircusAC., OMD, DM (P)
Professor of Natural Oncology, Da Vinci Institute of Holistic Medicine
Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine
Founder of Natural Allopathic Medicine